In the past, urban research based on complexity science has noticed the complexity of urban spatial structure and the interaction between the laws and relationships at different levels of hierarchies in complex systems, such as power law, self-organization, small world network, etc. This study focuses on the self-organization characteristics of individual land development behaviors in relation to the overall urban spatial structure. Firstly, at the level of individual agents, this research presents the behavioral patterns based on game theory that manipulate economic property rights when two types of agents in space (landowners and developers) conduct land transactions. Secondly, focusing on the interaction between the individual agents and the overall system, this research attempts to analyze it with computer simulation experiments to observe whether a large number of agents will produce a state of dynamic equilibrium derived from the process of continuous interaction and propagation in space. The simulation results show that the dissipation of different economic property rights after land transactions in the space will emerge into a fixed proportion caused by agents’ interaction, similar to the attractor of chaotic systems. Therefore, we believe that land development has a definite and unique self-organization characteristic, and then put forward the implications for urban planning.

Arthur, W. B., 1994, “Complexity in Economic Theory：Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality”, The American Economic Review, 84(2): 406-411.

Arthur, W. B., 2021, “Economics in Nouns and Verbs”, Economics, Cornell University, 2104.01868.

Axelrod, R., 1997, “The complexity of cooperation—Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration”, New Jersey: Princeton University Press Princeton.

Barzel, Y., 1989, Economic Analysis of Property Rights, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Barzel, Y., 1997, Economic Analysis of Property Rights, 2^nd ed, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Batty, M., 2005, Cities and complexity: Understanding cities through cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals, USA: The MIT Press.

Batty, M., 2012, “Building a science of cities”. Cities, 29(Supplement 1): 9-16.

Briassoulis, H., 2007, “Land-use policy and planning, theorizing, and modeling: lost in translation, found in complexity”, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 35(1): 16-33.

Chang Y. H., 2007, Self-organization of Homebuilding Industry in Kaohsiung City, Master thesis, Department of Urban Planning, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan.

Chang Y. H., 2014, Game Theory Analysis for the Negotiation Process between the Landowners and the Implementers in Urban Renewal, Master thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei.

Chapin F. S., and Kaiser E. J., 1979, “Urban Land Use Planning”, St. Champaign: University of Illinois.

Chiu S. C., 2001, Self-organization Phenomenon of Pedestrian Movement in Department Store Plaza, Master thesis, Department of Transportation and Logistics Management, National Chiao Tung University, Taipei.

Cristelli M., Batty. M., and Pietronero, L., 2012, “There is More than a Power Law in Zipf”, Scientific Reports, 2(1): 812.

Diana T., and Carmen C., 2013, “Why society is a complex problem? A review of Philip Ball’s book – Meeting Twenty-first Century Challenges with a New Kind of Science”, Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 2(1): 85-94.

Dixit A., and Nalebuff B. J., 2010/ Dong Z. Q., Wang E. S., and Li W. X. (Trans), 2016, The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist's Guide to Success in Business and Life, Taipei: Cite Publishing Ltd.

Guo D., Ren B., and Wang C., 2008, “Integrated Agent-Based Modeling with GIS for Large Scale Emergency Simulation”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5370: 618-625.

Huang J. Y., and Lai S. K., 2015, “Tradition and Transition of Urban Development Theory Toward A Thinking Mode Based on Organic Growth”, Journal of Geographical Science, 79: 31-64.

Huang K. C., Chan, S. L., Su K. C., and Wang T. Y., 2021, “Study on the Trend of Urban Hierarchical Change in Taiwan”, City and Planning, 48(1): 1-26.

Jacobs J., 1961/ Wu C. C. (Trans), 2007, The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Taipei: Linking Publishing Company.

Kanigel R., 2017/ Lin S. R. (Trans), 2019, Eyes on the Street: The Life of Jane Jacobs, Taipei: Linking Publishing Company.

Ko P. C., and Lai, S. K., 2013, “An Exploration into Urban Development Based on a Dissipative Structural Perspective: Computer Simulation, Empirical Study and Further Experimental Design”, Joint Annual Meeting of Taiwan Association of Urban Planning (Abstract Proceedings), Tainan: Chang Jung Christian University, 101-102.

Kreps D. M., 1990/ Deng F. (Trans), 1996, Game Theory and Economic Modelling, Taipei: Wu-Nan Book Inc.

Krugman, P., 1996, The Self-organizing Economy, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

Ku C. A., 2020, “An Agent-based Model for Simulating Complex Urban Dynamic Development Patterns”, City and Planning, 47(2): 149-172.

Lai S. K., 2010, Seeing through Complexity, Taipei: Archbook.

Lai S. K., 2021, “What Effects Do Urban Construction Boundaries Have on Developers’ Attitude? Urban Digital Party”, https://m.sohu.com/a/444620781_650480/?pvid=000115_3w_a, 2021.6.14 download.

Lai S. K., and Chen T. L., 2002, “Regional lock-in effect of agglomeration of firms－Some observations from increasing returns simulations”, Journal of Geographical Science, 31: 17-34.

Lai S. K., and Gao H. H., 2001, “Self-organized Criticality in Urban Complex Spatial Systems”, Journal of Building and Planning National Taiwan University, 10: 31-43.

Lai S. K., and Ko P. C., 2014, “Institutionalization of Five Metropolises and Lock-In Effects on Regional Development”, Research Report of National Science Council: NSC101-2420-H305-004-MY2.

Lai S. K., and Wang L. G., 2019, “Do Urban Growth Boundaries Contain Urban Sprawl? Explanations and Empirical Examination”, Urban Planning International, 33(1): 56-62.

Lai S. K., Wang Y. C., and Han H. Y., 2012, “Urban Self-organization A Simulation Comparison between Institutional and Spatial Change”, Journal of Geographical Science, 67: 49-71.

Lai S.K., and Ko, P.C., 2019, “A simulation design for the regional lock-in effect of urbanisation in Taiwan”, Urban Complexity, 11(1): 1-15.

Lai, S. K., 2021, Planning within Complex Urban Systems, London: Routledge.

Li T. C., and Hsieh Y. F., 2019, “Problems and Solutions in the Implementation of Taiwan Urban Planning”, City and Planning, 46(2): 119-146.

Lien Y. H., 2011,The Study of the Joint Development Land Of Resear ─ The Game Theory Approach, Master thesis, Institute of Business Administration, National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, Kaohsiung.

Lin F. T., 2006, National Land Planning and Land Use Simulation: A Case of Taipei Metropolitan Area—Sub-Project 2: Development Model of Taipei Metorpolitan Area (III), Taipei: Global Change Research Center at National Taiwan University.

Lin Y. C., 2010, An Influence Analysis on Urban Renewal Application Process by the Characteristics of Landlords in Taipei City Using Game Theory, Master thesis, Graduate Institute of Building and Planning, National Taiwan University, Taipei.

Lo C. C., 2008, A Game-Theoretical Analysis of Holdouts of Land Owners in Private Land Assembly and Development, Master thesis, department of Real Estate and Built Environment, National Taipei University, Taipei.

Longton C.G., 1995, Artificial Life: An OVERVIEW, USA: The MIT Press.

Mohamed, R., 2006, “The psychology of residential developers: lessons from behavioral economics and additional explanations for satisficing”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1): 28-37.

Schaeffer, P. V., and Hopkins L. D., 1987, “Behavior of land developers: planning and the economics of information”, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 19(9): 1221-1232.

Tsai C. H., 2011, “Self-organization, edge of chaos and principal leadership in the new era”, School Administrators, 71: 117-131.

Wang J.S., Xiong J.H., Yang K., Peng S.Y., and Xu Q., 2010, “Use of GIS and agent-based modeling to simulate the spread of influenza”, 2010 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics, Beijing: IEEE.

Wang L. G., and Lai S. K., 2008, “Complexity science and urban development theory: A review and prospects”, Journal of the Taiwan Society of Public Works, 4(4): 1-11.

Wang M. S., Pan C. J., and Lai I. C., 2017, “Governance Structure with Complex Systems for Urban Management”, City and Planning, 44(2): 149-169.

Wang M. Y., and Wu S. H., 2011, “To Explore the Dynamic Diffusion Process of an Innovation from Complexity Theory Perspective: A Laboratory Experiment of Diffusing an Innovative Concept”, Journal of Technology Management, 16(2): 81-119.

Webster, C. J., and Wu F., 1999a, “Regulation, land-use mix, and urban performance. Part 1：theory”, Environment and Planning A, 31(8): 1433-1442.

Webster, C. J., and Wu F., 1999b, “Regulation, land-use mix, and urban performance. Part 2：simulation”, Environment and Planning A, 31(9): 1529-1545.

Yang K., Li J. R., Cui Q. X., and Chen X. J., 2008, “The Spreading Agent of Aids and the GIS Model”, Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 40(4): 14-20.

The wetland and Qigu salt pan, located in the north of Taijiang National Park, has a close relationship with the overall ecosystem of Taijiang National Park. Since the suspension of production, the salt pan has been managed by different public and private departments, which means the management could not be developed comprehensively, resulting in the gradual loss of wetlands. In the long run, it is necessary to expand the allocation management for national parks. However, in the process of promoting wetland conservation, the government often faces the dilemma of opposition from interested parties and resistance from civil groups. In order to alleviate disputes, the head leader usually holds public hearings or seminars to have more communication and understanding, but it doesn't work well in the cases of misunderstanding or irrational public. Therefore, it is extremely important to understand the decision-making methods of the interested parties with different opinions, where they stand and the relationship network behind their decisions, especially their position and influence, in order to promote public-private cooperation and reduce communication costs.

Based on the social network analysis in the field of sociology, this study clarifies the interactive relationship and the influence of stakeholders such as the government, private business and third parties, and how the key roles affect the decision making of others in the network. The study found that the consultation and trust network, the public sector plays an extremely critical role, ranking on the important path of the network relationship structure, responsible for transmitting important information and resources, while the geographical closure and limited information in the private sector, resulting in loose relations and the difficulty to interact and cooperate between sectors. In addition, there are no single or multiple structural holes in the network, indicating that there is no interest party who monopolizes information and transmission resources. Therefore, in the strategy of promoting the expansion and establishment of national parks, the leaders should gather resources and information to publicize the advantages and disadvantages of the policies to opponents at the community level through each other's support and cooperation, avoiding the intervention and interference of external organizations. Building mutual trust and saving communication costs, to win the support from the community and to develop the project profoundly.

Adler, P.S., and Kwon, S.W., 2002, “Social capital: Prospects for a new concept”, Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 17-40.

Burt, R. S., 1992, Structural Holes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Freeman, L.C., 2004, The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science, Vancouver, BC Canada: Empirical Press.

Sheng, F.-C., 2020, Social Network Analysis of the Collaborative Meeting in the South Penghu Marine National Park, Taiwan: National Cheng Kung University Press.

Wang, G.-X., 2014, “The Application of Social Network Analysis to Public Administration Research”, Taiwan Association for Schools of Public Administration and Affairs, TASPAA, Survey Research－Method and Application, 34: 67-134.

Hsu, H.-C., 2012, Benefits beyond Boundaries of Protected Areas: Political Ecology and Stakeholder Analysis of the Creation of National Parks in Taiwan, Taiwan: National Taiwan University Press.

Chang, H.-T., and Liou, S.-N., 2002, “Exploring employee knowledge sharing from the perspective of social network theory”, Journal of human resource management, 3(2): 101-113.

Kuo, H.-M., 2003, An Evaluation of Citizen Participation under Environmental Impact Assessment in Taiwan: The Case of Pin-Nan Industrial Area Plan, Taiwan: Tunghai University Press.

Chen, H.-G., 2012, Governance Interdependence Theory and Practice, Taipei: Wunan Book Publishing Company.

Lee, L.-H., 2012, “The integrated habitat evaluation methods for wetland conservation-A case study of the Hou-Long coast in Miaoli”, Journal of wetlands, 1(2): 81-93.

Hsueh, M.-L., and Lin, H.-J., 2015, “Wetland Compensatory Mitigation: Mechanisms and Implementation in Taiwan”, Journal of Wetlands, 4(1): 22-30.

Wu, P.-C., 2019, Wise Use of Conservation Strategies Planning-Case Study Xi-Hu National Wetland in Miaoli County, Taiwan: Tunghai University Press.

Chen, P.-H., A Study on the Conservation of Terraced Paddy Fields in Gongliao: Perspective of Public-Private Partnerships, Taiwan: Tunghai University.

Chen, P.-S., and Chyi, S.-J., 2015, “A Preliminary Study of Wetlands Designation and Conflict Management in Taiwan”, Journal of wetlands, 4(1): 40-41.

Prell, C., 2012, Social Network Analysis: History, Theory and Methodology, London, UK: Sage.

Chen, Q.-C., 2009, Social Welfare Work Constructing the Connotation of Social Capital: Trust, Efficiency, Social Innovation - Seminar towards Universal Care Service Model/Case Analysis of Peng Wanru Foundation's Home Service Plan, Taipei: Peng Wan-ru foundation.

Chiu, T.-K., 2017, “Public Service Civil Partnerships under Good Collaborative Governance”, Homeland and Public Governance Quarterly, 5(1): 67-79.

Urban and Rural Development Branch, 2013, Nong Bong Kai Strategic Wetland Management Plan, Chiang San District, Chiang Rai Province, https://wetland-tw.tcd.gov.tw/tw/Ramsar.php/Nong Bong Kai Wetland Management Plan.pdf, (accessed September 12,2013).

Villion Yeu,1997, From the View of Policy Network to Analysis Chiku Wetland Issue, Taiwan: National Sun Yai-sen University Press.

Vedres, B., and D. Stark, 2010, “Structural Folds: Generative Disruption in Overlapping Groups”, Journal of Sociology, 115(4): 1150-1190.

Weatherford, M.S., 1982, “Interpersonal Networks and Political Behavior”, American Journal of Political Science, 26(1): 117-143.

Zhou, X.-G., 2003, Ten lectures on the sociology of organizations, Beijing, China: Social Sciences Academic Press.

The continuous transfer of knowledge within an industrial cluster is a key element for the cluster to maintain its long-term competitiveness. In recent years, various shocks have occurred frequently, and issues related to the resilience of regional economies and industrial clusters have attracted attention. These shocks may also hinder the transfer of knowledge within industrial clusters, thereby limiting the development of industrial clusters. However, most of the previous studies have focused on economic performance, and little attention has been paid to how knowledge exchanges within the firms in cluster are affected by shocks. Therefore, this study adopted a resilience perspective, examined the evolution of innovation modes and proximity within industrial clusters, and constructed a four-quadrant analytical framework consisting of two types of proximity and two types of innovation modes, respectively. We attempted to examine whether shocks cause the shift of innovation modes and proximity in the four-quadrant analytical framework to fill the aforementioned gap. In order to further explored its connotation and make future policy advice more valuable, this study used the concept of life cycle development of clusters to analyze evolution. We took the Hsinchu Science Park as the research object, and used the global financial crisis in 2008 and the Covid-19 in 2020 as the shocks to compare the change of innovation modes and proximity at different life cycle stage.

Apanasovich, N., 2016, “Modes of innovation: a grounded meta-analysis”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(3): 720-737.

Apanasovich, N., Alcalde-Heras, H., and Parrilli, M. D., 2017, “A new approach to business innovation modes: the ‘Research, Technology and Human Resource Management (RTH) model’in the ICT sector in Belarus”, European planning studies, 25(11): 1976-2000.

Bien, T.-M., Lin, S.-W., and Chen, H.-R., 2014, “Proximity, Absorptive Capacity, and Firm Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study of Taiwan's Biotechnology Firms”, Journal of City and Planning, 41(4): 357-394.

Boschma, R., 2015, “Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience”, Regional studies, 49(5): 733-751.

Brenner, T., 2006, “Identification of local industrial clusters in Germany”, Regional studies, 40(9): 991-1004.

Brenner, T., and Schlump, C., 2011, “Policy measures and their effects in the different phases of the cluster life cycle”, Regional studies, 45(10): 1363-1386.

Chan, H.H., Hu, T.-S., Fan, P., 2019, “Social sustainability of urban regeneration led by industrial land redevelopment in Taiwan”, European Planning Studies, 27(7): 1245-1269.

Fingleton, B., Garretsen, H., and Martin, R., 2012, “Recessionary shocks and regional employment: evidence on the resilience of UK regions”, Journal of regional science, 52(1): 109-133.

Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., and Verburg, T., 2007, “Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth”, Regional studies, 41(5): 685-697.

Grabher, G., 2002, “Cool projects, boring institutions: temporary collaboration in social context”, Regional studies, 36(3): 205-214.

Hsieh, H.-N., Chen, C.-M., Wang, J.-Y., and Hu, T.-S., 2015, “Knowledge-intensive business services as knowledge intermediaries in industrial regions: A Comparison of the Hsinchu and Tainan metropolitan areas”, European planning studies, 23(11): 2253-2274.

Hsieh, H.-N., Hu, T.-S., Ko, T.-C., and Hsueh, P.-P., “A Study of the Spatial Evolution of Production Activities Around Hsinchu Science-Based Industrial Park”, Environment and the World, (11): 1-31.

Hu, T.-S., 2017, “Developments in interactive relationships and knowledge between KIBS firms and their clients in Taiwan”, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 5(2): 257-271.

Hu, T.-S., and Chang, S.-L., 2001, “Technological Infrastructure, Industrial Cluster and Local Innovative Network: The Hsin-Chu Case”, Journal of architecture and planning, 2(1): 27-42.

Hu, T.-S., Lin, C.-Y., and Chang, S.-L., 2002, “A Study on Technology Based Firms Clustering and the Emergence of Innovation and Production Networks: Hsinchu and Tainan Cases”, Environment and World, (6): 1-29.

Hu, T.-S., Lin, C.-Y., and Chien, H.-T., 2005, “The Effects between Technological Communities Interaction and Industrial Clustering on Innovation Activity: A Case of Hsinchu District”, Journal of architecture and planning, 6(1): 43-61.

Hu, T.-S., Yu, S.-P., Chou, H.-M., Chia, P.-C., and Lo, H.-M., 2015, “A Study on Innovation and Production Network in Traditional Industries Area - a Case of Changhua County”, Journal of architecture and planning, 16(2/3): 111-134.

Huang, K.-C., Hu, T.-S., Wang, J.-Y., Chen, K.-C., and Lo, H.-M., 2016, “From Fashion Product Industries to Fashion: Upgrading Trends in Traditional Industry in Taiwan”, European Planning Studies, 24(4): 762-787.

Huber, F., 2012, “On the role and interrelationship of spatial, social and cognitive proximity: Personal knowledge relationships of R&D workers in the Cambridge information technology cluster”, Regional studies, 46(9): 1169-1182.

Lin, H.-P., and Hu, T.-S., 2017, “Knowledge Interaction and Spatial Dynamics in Industrial Districts”, Sustainability, 9(8): 1421.

Lin, H.-P., and Hu, T.-S., 2018, “Spatial Development and Interaction of Innovative Knowledge among Industries in the Southern Taiwan”, Journal of City and Planning, 45(3): 211-235.

Lin, K.-F., Hu, T.-S., Hsieh, H.-N., and Chia, P.-C., 2012, “Industrial Cluster Formation and Evolution-The Case of Hsinchu Area”, Journal of architecture and planning, 13(1): 45-74.

Liu, W.-S., Hu, T.-S., and Pan, S.-C., 2021, “Facing the Age of Innovation: The Transformation of Science Parks”, Journal of Taiwan Land Research, 24(2):139-169.

Maggioni, M. A., 2004, “The rise and fall of industrial clusters: Technology and the life cycle of region”, IEB Working Paper, 2004/6.

Martin, R., and Sunley, P., 2011, “Conceptualizing cluster evolution: beyond the life cycle model?”, Regional studies, 45(10): 1299-1318.

Martin, R., and Sunley, P., 2015, “On the notion of regional economic resilience: conceptualization and explanation”, Journal of Economic Geography, 15(1): 1-42.

Martin, R., Sunley, P., Gardiner, B., and Tyler, P., 2016, “How regions react to recessions: Resilience and the role of economic structure”, Regional studies, 50(4): 561-585.

Maskell, P., and Malmberg, A., 2007, “Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution”, Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5): 603-618.

Mattes, J., 2012, “Dimensions of proximity and knowledge bases: Innovation between spatial and non-spatial factors”, Regional studies, 46(8): 1085-1099.

Menzel, M.-P., and Fornahl, D., 2007, “Cluster life cycles-Dimensions and rationales of cluster development”, Jena Economic Research Paper, 2007-076.

Menzel, M.-P., and Fornahl, D., 2010, “Cluster life cycles—dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution”, Industrial and corporate change, 19(1): 205-238.

Pan, S.-C., Hu, T.-S., and Chia, P.-C., 2019, “Shaping of the innovation milieu of Taiwan's machine tool industry from the perspective of innovation input and talent evolution”, Journal of architecture and planning, 20(2): 115-138.

Parrilli, M. D., and Heras, H. A., 2016, “STI and DUI innovation modes: Scientific-technological and context-specific nuances”, Research Policy, 45(4): 747-756.

Pendall, R., Foster, K. A., and Cowell, M., 2010, “Resilience and regions: building understanding of the metaphor”, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1): 71-84.

Pike, A., Dawley, S., and Tomaney, J., 2010, “Resilience, adaptation and adaptability”, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1): 59-70.

Presutti, M., Boari, C., Majocchi, A., and Molina‐Morales, X., 2019, “Distance to customers, absorptive capacity, and innovation in high‐tech firms: The dark face of geographical proximity”, Journal of Small Business Management, 57(2): 343-361.

Santner, D., 2018, “Proximity and modes of innovation–evidence from two agricultural engineering industries in north-west Germany”, European planning studies, 26(5): 877-894.

Staber, U., and Sautter, B., 2011, “Who are we, and do we need to change? Cluster identity and life cycle”, Regional studies, 45(10): 1349-1361.

Storper, M., and Scott, A. J., 2009, “Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth”, Journal of economic geography, 9(2): 147-167.

Torre, A., 2008, “On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission”, Regional studies, 42(6): 869-889.

Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., and Isaksen, A., 2018, “Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development”, Progress in human geography, 42(5): 687-705.

Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., Isaksen, A., and Sinozic, T., 2015, “Perspectives on cluster evolution: critical review and future research issues”, European planning studies, 23(10): 2028-2044.

Wang, J.-H., and Kao, S.-C., 2000, “Global and Local: Learning Regions of Hsinchu and Taichung Compared”, Taiwanese Journal of Sociology, (24): 179-237.

You, J.-X., and Hu, T.-S., 2022, “Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Economic Resilience in Industrial Parks”, Journal of City and Planning, 1-25. (Accepted)

The growing population has led to increased demand for housing in Magelang City, Indonesia, especially for the low-income society. Despite the efforts of the local government to provide housing aid through vertical housing, the demand for vertical houses is still relatively low, as indicated by the low occupancy level of the currently available vertical houses. This paper applies the SEM to analyze the gap between the demand and supply of vertical housing in Magelang City, Indonesia. The data is collected using questionnaires distributed to respondents eligible for housing aid in Magelang City. The analysis is conducted using four latent variables: socioeconomic, perception, promotion, decision, and applying Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with three additional variables on the supply side: price, facilities, and occupancy. This paper shows that from the demand side, the decision to choose a vertical house is affected mainly by the perception of the vertical house. Meanwhile, from the supply side, facilities play a crucial role in determining the occupancy level of the currently available vertical houses. These two variables explain the gap between demand and supply of vertical housing in Magelang City. The result also suggests that promotion might be a valuable tool to correct society's perception.

Anacker, K. B., 2019, “Introduction: Housing Affordability and Affordable Housing”, International Journal of Housing Policy, 19 (1): 1-16.

Arku, G., 2006, “The Housing and Economic Development Debate Revisited: Economic Significanceof Housingin Developing Countries”, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21: 377-395.

Bentler, P. M., and Chou, C. P., 1987, “Practical Issues in Structural Modeling”,Sociological methods & research, 16(1): 78-117.

Boomsma, A., 1985, “Non-convergence, Improper Solutions, and Starting Values in LISREL Maximum Likelihood Estimation”,Psychometrika, 50(2): 229-242.

De Decker, P., and Pannecoucke, I., 2004, “The Creation of the Incapable Social Tenant in Flanders, Belgium. An Appraisal”, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19: 293-309.

Estiri, H., 2015, “Household Energy Consumption and Housing Choice in the U.S. Residential Sector”,Housing Policy Debate,26(1): 231-250.

Goody, J., Chandler, R., Clancy, J., Dixon, D., and Wooding, G., 2010, “Building Type Basics for Housing”, Second Edition, Wiley: John Wiley and Sons.

Hammam, S., 2013, Housing Matters, USA: The World Bank.

Heinrich, K. M., Lee, R. E., Suminski, R. R., Regan, G. R., Reese-Smith, J. Y., Howard, H. H., and Ahluwalia, J. S., 2007. “Associations between the Built Environment and Physical Activity in Public Housing Residents”, International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4(1): 56.

Hodkinson, S., Watt, P., and Mooney, G., 2013, “Neoliberal Housing Policy–Time for a Critical Re-Appraisal In”, Critical Social Policy, 30(1): 3-16.

Houard, N., 2011, “The French Homelessness Strategy: Reforming Temporary Accommodation, and Access to Housing to Deliver ‘Housing First’: Continuum or Clean Break?”,European Journal of Homelessness, 5(2): 83-98.

Hu, L. T., and Bentler, P. M., 1999, “Cut off Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives”,Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1): 1-55.

Huang, Z., and Du, X., 2015, “Assessment and Determinants of Residential Satisfaction with Public Housing in Hangzhou, China”, Habitat International, 47: 218-230.

Hui, E. C.M., and  Zheng, X., 2010, “Measuring Customer Satisfaction of FM Service in Housing Sector”,Facilities, 28(5): 306-320.

Joshi, S., and Khan, M. S., 2010, “Aided Self-help: The Million Houses Programme—Revisiting the Issues”,Habitat International, 34: 306-314.

Kohl, S., 2015, “The Power of Institutional Legacies: How Nineteenth-Century Housing Associations Shaped Twentieth-Century Housing Regime: Differences between Germany and The United States”,European Journal of Sociology, 56(2): 271-306.

Lee, J., and Ngai-ming, Y., 2006, “Public Housing and Family Life in East Asia: Housing History and Social Change in Hong Kong, 1953-1990”, Journal of Family History, 31(1): 66-82.

Li, V. J., 2016, “Housing Policies in Hong Kong, China and the People’s Republic of China”, Governance and public sector management, 566: 1-32.

Lundqvist, L. J., 1992, “Dislodging the Welfare State? Housing and Privatization in Four Europeans Nations”,Delft: Delft University Press.

Miller, F. D., Tsemberis, S., Malia, G. P., and Grega, D., 1980, “Neighborhood Satisfaction among Urban Dwellers”,Journal of Social Issues, 36(3): 101-117.

Oktay, E., Karaaslan, A., Alkan, Ö., and Çelik, A. K., 2014, “Determinants of housing demand in the Erzurum province, Turkey”,International Journal of Housing Markets and analysis, 7(4): 586-602.

Pettinger, T., 2019, “Factors Affecting Supply and Demand of Housing”, Economics Help, https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/15390/housing/factors-affecting-supply-and-demand-of-housing/, (April 11, 2020).

Phang, S. Y., 2013, Do Singaporeans Spend too Much on Housing?, Singapore: Singapore Management University.

Qian, X., Chen, Y., and Cheung, E. S. L., 2019, “Changes and Trend of Public Housing Policy in Netherlands, Hong Kong, and Mainland China”, Conference Paper in the 2019 International Conference on Pedagogy, Communication and Sociology (ICPCS 2019), Atlantis Press.

Rhodes, M. L., and Mullins, D., 2009, “Market Concepts, Coordination Mechanisms and New Actors in Social Housing”, European Journal of Housing Policy, 9(2): 107-119.

Sim, L. L., Yu, S. M., and Han, S. S., 2003, “Public Housing and Ethnic Integration in Singapore”,Habitat International, 27: 293-307.

Statistics Indonesia (Badan Pusat Statistik-BPS Indonesia), 2015, Social and Population – Housing, https://www.bps.go.id, (July 3, 2019).

Statistics Magelang City (BPS Kota Magelang), 2019, Official Statistics Publication, https://magelangkota.bps.go.id, (July 1, 2019).

The Ministry of Public Works and Housing of Republic of Indonesia (PUPR), 2011, The Law of Republic of Indonesia No. 20, 2011 about Vertical Housing, https://pug-pupr.pu.go.id/_uploads/PP/UU.%20No.%2020%20Th.%202011.pdf, (June 14, 2019).

Towers, G., 2000, “Shelter is Not Enough: Transforming Multi-storey Housing”, Policy Press: Bristol University Press.

Whitehead, C. M. E., and Scanlon, K., 2007, “Social Housing in Europe”,In: Whitehead, Christine M. E., and Scanlon, Kathleen, (eds.) Social Housing in Europe. LSE London, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, 8-33.

Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., and Miller, M. W., 2013, “Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety”,Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6): 913-934.

Woo, A., Cho, G-H., Kim. J., 2019, “Would You Share Your Home? The Multifaceted Determinants of Preference for Shared Housing among Young Adults”,Applied Geography, 103:12-21.

Yap, K. S., 2015, “The Enabling Strategy and Its Discontent: Low-income Housing Policies and Practices in Asia”,Habitat International, 30: 1-7.